red brown cracked very dry desert earth close up

Climate change and climate discourse: A dual disintegration

I was idly watching the world go by on Bluesky around 25 September when I noticed a conjunction of several events that made me think about climate change communication yet again, and how bad things are at the moment.

On 24/25 September, an Extreme Weather conference (ExtremWetterKongress) was taking place in Hamburg, Germany, where a broad spectrum of lay and expert people discussed not only an observed acceleration in the warming of our planet, but also the disproportionately high rise in global temperatures over the last 18 years. At the same time, Daniel Swain, a Californian climate and weather scientist and communicator, warned that climate change is increasing the likelihood and severity of extreme weather types that already occur–bringing about a more intense variation on a familiar theme. But it is also expanding the range of what’s possible in new locations around the world.

On 24 September, U.S. President Donald Trump gave a speech at the United Nations General Assembly and said that “This ‘climate change,’ it’s the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion […] All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong. They were made by stupid people that have cost their countries fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success. If you don’t get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail.” While Trump talked about a ‘green scam’, the German tabloid Bild talked a day later about a ‘green fairytale’ in a headline for an article blaming job losses on electric vehicles.

Climate change is changing, but climate change discourse, it seems, is not, at least in some corners of Europe and the United States. Climate denial and obstructionism, once a fringe phenomenon, are now embedded in government discourses. Özden Terli, a meteorologist and climate communicator, noted during the Hamburg Extreme Weather Conference that we can observe “Ein Zerstören der Diskurse, indem man immer einfach noch mehr Unsinn verbreitet”, that is to say, a destruction of discourses (about climate change) by simply spreading more and more nonsense.

Dangerously, this nonsense is not only pushed by humans, but now also by AI, or rather by humans weaponising AI to flood the internet with mis/disinformation, as this video demonstrates quite clearly. This conjunction of human and AI discourses, of human nonsense and AI slop, is dangerous, as they mutually amplify each other. While the climate disintegrates, so does the discourse about it.

Image by Wanderingnome, Flickr


Discover more from Making Science Public

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

One response to “Climate change and climate discourse: A dual disintegration”

  1. Making Science Public 2025: End-of-year round-up of blog posts – Making Science Public Avatar

    […] all these posts is a dual concern: the physical disintegration of stable climate patterns and the discursive disintegration of our ability to talk sensibly about it. As I wrote in one post, we’re experiencing a dual […]

    Like

Leave a comment

Discover more from Making Science Public

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading