Tag: AI

  • Polysemy, pragmatics and puppetry: What AI can learn from ethnomethodology

    Polysemy, pragmatics and puppetry: What AI can learn from ethnomethodology

    I recently wrote a blog post in which I summarised some research on the topic of multiple meanings and AI against the backdrop of an old paper of mine on ‘ambiguities we live by’, published in 2001 in the Journal of Pragmatics. Pragmatics is a branch of linguistics that studies how language is used in…

  • AI literacy and the case for polysemy awareness

    AI literacy and the case for polysemy awareness

    I have recently written two posts on the issue of multiple meanings, polysemy and ambiguity, in AI discourse. When chatting with various people interested in AI metaphors, which has so far been my research focus, I realised that we all had neglected the topic of polysemy, or the multiple meanings that words have in a…

  • ‘Fake’: From murky origins to murky future

    ‘Fake’: From murky origins to murky future

    On 2 February 2024 I wrote a post entitled “Truth, post-truth and post-fake”. I started the post like this: “I was sitting at my desk trying to think about something I could blog about. For some reason the word ‘truth’ popped into my head. After that I … messed about on the news database Nexis, rummaged…

  • Polysemy, safety and epistemic risks in AI discourse

    Polysemy, safety and epistemic risks in AI discourse

    In last week’s post I traced some connections between an old paper on ambiguity and polysemy that a colleague and I published in 2001, when generative AI and LLMs were not yet on the horizon, and a 2026 paper linking ambiguity and polysemy to modern AI discourse to hype and manipulation, power and ethics. In…

  • Polysemy, power and ethics in AI discourse

    Polysemy, power and ethics in AI discourse

    I recently saw a paper by Travis LaCroix, Fintan Mallory and Sasha Luccioni entitled ‘Strategic polysemy in AI discourse: A philosophical analysis of language, hype, and power’ which immediately attracted my attention as I had worked on ambiguity and polysemy, in the distant past. I am now working on metaphors used in and for AI but I…

  • Sandboxes and moats: Wrestling with AI metaphors

    Sandboxes and moats: Wrestling with AI metaphors

    After this morning’s (17 April 2026) news reports, most of you will know about the furore surrounding the non-release of Anthropic’s Claude Mythos AI model and its implications for cybersecurity (listen to this podcast to get some understanding). Cybersecurity will, however, not be the focus of this post; it will, of course, be metaphors. The…

  • ‘Habsburg AI’: Portrait of a metaphor and its family

    ‘Habsburg AI’: Portrait of a metaphor and its family

    A reader of my blog (yes, there is one!) recently asked me whether I had heard of “Habsburg AI”. To my shame I had not. So, I looked it up and what I found made me think, both about AI and about metaphors for AI. I have been blogging about metaphors for AI for a…

  • Is ‘cultural technology’ a metaphor for AI?

    Is ‘cultural technology’ a metaphor for AI?

    This morning, I opened Bluesky and saw a message from Matthew Cobb alerting me to an article in The Observer on “Ten metaphors for AI” by John Naughton. Metaphors for AI, c’est moi, I thought, and indeed in the online version there is a link to one of my posts. Wow. At the same time…

  • AI through a bilingual lens: Metaphors in Italian and English

    AI through a bilingual lens: Metaphors in Italian and English

    This is a guest post by Barbara Gabriella Renzi and Giulio Napolitano who have just published an article exploring AI metaphors from a bilingual perspective, comparing metaphors in English and Italian. This adds a new dimension to my own work on AI metaphors here on the Making Science Public blog and fills a real gap…

  • Vibe-coding spaghetti: Unpacking an AI metaphor for biology

    Vibe-coding spaghetti: Unpacking an AI metaphor for biology

    I recently saw a post on Bluesky just saying “Coconuts”. Intriguing! Underneath was a screenshot of a tweet which was even more intriguing. The tweet said: “A techbro told me that biology is easy because DNA is just code, right? I told him that DNA is 4 billion year old, completely undocumented, vibe-coded spaghetti, built…